Mi #4
![]() Forgery |
![]() Original? |
The so-called "Flower Design" issues (Mi #1-4) have large variation in colour, and the printing quality of the originals is very poor. There are large numbers of different forgeries on the market, and it is very difficult to be sure that you actually have an original stamp in your possession. Generally, original issues have a more even colour application with fewer spots. The forgeries have more uneven colour application with numerous spots and rather uneven contours of edges and letters [1].
The most important characteristics to distinguish originals of the 70 K issue (Mi #4)
from forgeries of Jaan Lubi are [1]:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
During his studies, Erik Sjoegren discovered that all the Jaan Lubi forgeries were made of 4 different types with clearly distinct characteristics [2]. The first issues (Flower design) were printed simply in blocks of 4, while the later issues were printed in bigger sheets of 4x4, 4x5 and 4x6 issues, maybe due to increased demand. In all these printings 4 distinct types are found in different combinations within each sheet. These types are designated A, B, C and D in the following.
The Lubi forgeries of the first Estonian issues (Flower design) were printed in blocks of 4 in the following layout:
A |
B |
C |
D |
At present, I can only show the identifying characteristics of Type B of this issue [2] (with my own observations added). Sjogren's descriptions are made from blackprints of original plates. The different forgeries in my collection have very uneven colour application, however, and few of them seem to fit his descriptions... More information will follow...
Type A:
|
![]() |
Type B:
|
![]() |
![]() |
Type C:
|
Type D:
|